Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

Every word praise of Argerich's playing on this website is certainly heartfelt and true. Of the pianist's genius there is no disputing. But whether she is doing justice to Chopin is perhaps another matter. I am reminded of some tenors in opera who approach every bar of music with whitehot intensity, even where the situation (and the composer's markings) call for gentleness. In a more recent recording, Argerich keeps the conductor hard pressed to follow her tempi, making the work her show entirely and not a concerto in the strict sense of the word. So here on this EMI recording we have the music brilliantly played--and this is one CD I plan to keep in my collection--but (and I ask this hestitatingly and humbly) is this Chopin being played by Argerich or Argerich playing Chopin? Thomas May's comments above go quite some way in answering this question; but we are not dealing with concrete, only abstract, nouns here. Another analogy might be all those Ella Fitzgerald sets of Gershwin, Kern, et alia. Certainly here we have these composers deconstructed and recreated to fit the singer's brand of performance. Well, Gershwin survives, Kern does not, Berlin does, and so on. So again I have to wonder if these highly idiosyncratic playings are true to the composer (whatever that might mean). On the other hand, great music exists objectively only as notes on lines on paper. Perhaps Chopin never had this kind of playing mind but certainly would accept it. That must remain forever a moot point. Still 5 stars to CD.