Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

Why would someone succumb to the lure of authoritarianism? This question ran through my mind as I read Anne Applebaum’s Twilight of Democracy: The Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism. As I compiled a list of the contributing factors, a second thought appeared--we are all susceptible, no matter how educated we may be nor how much money we earn. Please note. Anne Applebaum reminds us that she refrained from providing a list of factors, as she urges us not to look for simple answers. It could be as little as one or it could be all of descriptors that pushed someone into the arms of totalitarianism. How would one ever know? Maybe this list should be seen as reasons rather than factors or descriptors. Regardless, please view what I have written as a gambit. Any mistakes are totally mine. Internal Factors (Reasons) • A person’s eccentricity leads him or her down the path of fanaticism and conspiracy (p. 9). • Inflammatory language is appealing (p. 9). • A political party that promotes opposing moral views of their current family situation is attractive (p. 10). • A scapegoat provides a simple answer to their country’s problems (p. 11). • Some are searching for a new identify that makes them feel special or superior (p. 12). • People can succumb to irrationality and their passions (p. 15). • Some people disdain complexity (p. 16). • Members of the intellectual elite become dissatisfied with the objective pursuit of truth to become promoters of extreme propaganda and conspiracy (p. 18). • Some believe that existing institutions are corrupt and need to be destroyed (p. 20). • Some are repulsed by the perceived weakness of the political center (p. 20). • Some are simply opportunists (p. 20). • Some who are deeply religious feel threatened by a secular society (p. 21). • Some are attracted to the idea of chaos (p. 21). • Many are looking to redefine their nations and rewrite social contracts (p. 21). • Some want to alter the rules of democracy so that they will never lose power (p. 21). • They believe that they will receive financial and social rewards for pledging loyalty (p.23). • They see it as an opportunity for upward mobility (p. 24). • They feel resentful because of their perceived lack of success in the current system (p. 24). • Some believe they deserve to rule (p. 29). • Some resent and are envious of others' success under the current system (p. 29). • Some are interested in a political career early on (p. 32). • Some are fascinated by authoritarian figures (p. 32). • Some hold anti-immigrant and anti-Semitic views (p. 46). • Some hold the perception that they feel patronized by the cultural elite (p. 50). • Some are a profound cynic (p. 52). • Some are searching to satisfy their desire for harmony and community (p. 59). • Some are nostalgic for a previous era in which they perceived their country made the rules (p. 62-63). • Some are searching for a leader of action (p. 64). • Some are looking for a party that can collaborate with other superpowers (p. 66). • Some are searching for ways to impress others (p. 71). • Some are looking to fill a vacuum in a political party (p. 73). • Some want to reconstruct a myth of a bygone era (p. 74). • Some see their country and society in decline (p. 80). • Some hold racial or racist views (p. 86). • Some believe that only a revolution can reform the system’s current corruption (p. 89). • Some believe hardship long-term is good for a country (p. 92). • Some believe that reports about a totalitarian country are fake (p. 99). • Some engage in moral equivalence to justify a government bad action (p. 100). • They believe a meritocratic system is unfair (p. 109). • They believe their values are not represented in society (p. 139). • People believe in the invincibility of democracy (p. 142). • People lose faith in progress and social mobility (p. 146). • Those on the extreme edges are also attracted to violence (p. 151). • People see no difference in political forms of government (p. 152). • People’s optimism disappears over time (p. 165). • People believe the ends justify the means if it restores the greatness of their country (p. 171). • A social controversy divides people into camps, leading to questions of national identity (p. 174). • People fear for their lives due to a crisis (p. 184). External Factors (Reasons) • An extremist political party deceives the public by running a moderate campaign (p. 4). • The right conditions can turn any society against democracy (p. 14). • Some had a negative experience with an opposing political/social group (p. 20). • A few can become very wealthy under an authoritarian system (p. 26). • They are promised protection from accusations of corruption or incompetence (p. 26). • History operates in a vicious cycle in a person’s country (p. 57). • People live in a society undergoing complex change (p. 106). • People view serious outbreaks of crime (p. 106) • Certain groups of people experience added competition for certain jobs as a result of recent migration (p. 107). • There is a cantankerous modern discourse (p. 109). • They are living during a period of severe economic inequality and wage decline (p. 109). • There has been a shift in advertising from newspapers to the Internet (p. 112). • People now hold different opinions as well as a different set of facts (p. 113). • The information sphere is perceived to have no trusted authorities and sources (p. 113). • Algorithms produce the information that you want to read and watch (p. 113). • The medium of debate has moved online (p. 115). • Fragmentation of the public sphere creates mistrust and instability (p. 115). • There is an absence of a center ground (p. 115). • There has been a rise in partisanship (p. 116). • There is waning respect of neutral institutions (p. 116). • There has been growth in angry rhetoric (p. 116). • Modern democratic institutions are based on outmoded information technology (p. 116). • Modern debate no longer builds consensus and promotes aggressive confrontation (p. 117). • Targeted political campaigns can be established instantaneously on the Internet (p. 117). • Mainstream parties do not address real issues of modern life (p. 123). • Upstart political parties have the ability to bundle together issues, repackage, and then market an identity to a targeted audience (p. 123). • There is international support for a political party or movement (p. 128). • There is more cooperation and coordination among extreme political movements (p. 132). • Extreme pessimism about a country is transmitted from generation to generation (p. 149). • The disease of nihilism wreaks havoc on a country (p. 187).