1,393
people found this helpful, as of 2023
ranked #5,660 most helpful
out of 571,544,897 reviews
★★☆☆☆
I'm sorry I wanted objectivity!
Thesis: "Nothing anything Mao ever did was any good!"
Evidence: Everything bad Mao ever did
Coutner-Evidence: None!
Conclusion: Mao bad, fire good!
A biography by someone who does not like Mao is far more refreshing than one by someone who drank the Kool-Aid.
Yet this book presents the thesis that Mao was after one thing - Personal Power. Neither Jung nor Halliday explain why this man gave up all his power in the KMT to lead a peasant revolution, if he only sought power.
If you think Mao was a great man who led a great revolution that did nothing but help the Chinese people - read this book.
If you wish to find an objective telling of Mao's life - read Philip Short's "Mao: A Life"
January 2007 · Books