Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

Research. The choice is obvious. Right away many of the results looked very suspect to me, having spent countless hours bench-marking both the 2700X and 8700K, I have a good idea of how they compare in a wide range of titles and these results looked very off. Having spotted a few dodgy looking results my next thought was, why is PCGamesN publishing this misleading data and why aren't they not tearing the paid benchmark report apart? Do they simply not know better? So it’s quite obvious that the Principled Technologies results are a load of rubbish and no one should be reproducing them. Of course, the focus here for Intel was to highlight how great the Core i9-9900K is and unfortunately right now I can’t show the real results for that CPU. Needless to say though, it won’t be 50% faster than the 2700X in games. The 9900K will be faster than the 2700X for gaming, no doubt about it, but it’s also going to cost twice as much once you factor in the motherboard price.