Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

It’s actually despicable how fast and loose Mr McGowen plays with the facts. By continually doing so in the book, he tries to hypnotize you into his conspiratorial thinking. He looks at the facts and events, sees them through his own biases and reads into them with virtually no evidence for what he’s suggesting. He sees conspiracy in all of the deaths, when in many cases there is nothing to suggest it, like when he implies that the man importing rare animals from South America is doing so as as a front for intelligence gathering, when there is nothing at all to suggest this whatsoever. The book is a classic example of reading into events with out firsthand interviews or supporting evidence. Is his thesis therefore totally wrong? No, there may be some truth but his method is without rigour and lacks integrity. Especially if he’s wrong, then he is downright slandering these celebrities. Sadly, the huge amount of positive reviews indicates a demographic of readers who never were taught critical thinking!! C’mon people?!!!