122
people found this helpful, as of 2023
ranked #230,590 most helpful
out of 571,544,897 reviews
★☆☆☆☆
It takes a pseudo history and tries to pass it off as "authentic truth"
Large parts of the outrageous claims made by this book have been shown to be untrue by may highly respected historians. Remember Jones is a reporter not a historian and she had a narrative that was more important than the facts to her. If you read this, you should also read 1620 a response to the 1619 project and then make up your mind.
