Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

according to people

110
people found this helpful, as of 2023
ranked #242,370 most helpful out of 571,544,897 reviews
★☆☆☆☆
When I first started using these cards they were great. I believe I was studying the thorax
Let me explain why I gave this product 1 stars. When I first started using these cards they were great. I believe I was studying the thorax, abdomen and pelvis. I would go to those sections, look at the number assigned to a figure and I would learn the anatomy. However, Now that I am on the limbs, it is becoming increasingly obvious that the people who made these flashcards do not know what flashcards are. Now, each of the flash cards displays a title on the picture side of the card. Which is okay, as long as the title is not answer. This was the case for thorax, abdomen and pelvis. For example; the card title says "Pelvic Girdle: superior view" and then there are a few figures numbered and on the back side the numbers have the answers. However, of the 65 cards of the "upper limb" section which I just brought to the coffee shop, ONLY 10 ARE USABLE AS FLASHCARDS BECAUSE THE ANSWER IS NOT THE TITLE. LITERALLY 55 OF THESE CARDS have only a SINGLE number and the TITLE OF THE FLASH CARD is the answer to that number which is on the PICTURE SIDE OF THE FLASHCARD. How are you supposed to study flash cards that have the ANSWER ON THE SAME SIDE AS THE QUESTION. This is infuriating and a massive waste of my time. And because the cards have a gloss finish, I can't just use a sharpie to deface the ANSWER THAT IS ON THE SAME SIDE AS THE QUESTION. What were these people thinking? If I wanted labeled pictures of anatomy, I would have gotten the textbook. See the pictures I have added for examples of poorly thought out design
January 2016 · Books
the product in question
Netter's Anatomy Flash Cards: with Online Student Consult Access (Netter Basic Science)
4.6★ · 571 ratings, as of 2023
worser bester