Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

The book is written like the author did most of his writing in academic situations where he had to stretch 10 pages worth of thoughts into a 50 page paper. Excessively wordy, and uses footnotes simply to add his own thoughts. It's a philosophical treatise on psychology. Meaning he pontificates on his own thoughts or on his observations of other people, rather than accurately describing his own experiences and how he changed. I was looking for solutions on how to stop procrastinating, not somebody's random rambling on what factors cause somebody to procrastinate. Not even sure I will finish the book. It's a good example of why publishing companies screen manuscripts and why editors exist. It's a waste of the $8 I spent on the book. Maybe if it had been only $2 I wouldn't be so annoyed. I mean, who reads a book to get a footnote on the "central limit theorem" from statistics that takes up half a page.