Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

Bearing in mind that a study found that less than 0.7% of peer-reviewed scientific articles published between 1991 and 2011 (John Cook et al .2013; Environmental Research Letters 8 024024) - from a total of 11,944 articles- refuted anthropogenic climate changes' occurrence, Senator Inhofe's book is a truly astounding example of ignoring facts and scientific evidence. It's like a judge presided over a court case where the murder was not only observed by several witnesses killing someone, but also videoed, recorded in the act, left DNA, fingerprints and fiber samples all over the corpse and himself, wrote that they did the act in blood on the wall, and then who signed a confession, finding the murder completely innocent, and then determining that the murder was done by some huge conspiracy, who framed an innocent man. The idea that climate change scientists are colluding in some massive conspiracy is a paranoid delusion of extreme proportions. The fact that the writer of this book has a senior position in the US Government makes it more of a horror story than an autobiography.