Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

according to people

153
people found this helpful, as of 2023
ranked #208,514 most helpful out of 571,544,897 reviews
★☆☆☆☆
Worse Than Junk Science, It is Dishonest
Pandas and People says different species appeared all at once, such as birds appearing as they are today, complete with feathers and beaks and such. Wrong. It says scientists don't have evidence that whales evolved from land-based critters. Wrong. It says the bones in the inner ear of mammals didn't evolve from bones that were once part of the jaw in older creatures. Wrong. It claims scientists are wrong about classifying animals because dogs and wolves are similar to Tasmanian wolves, which are classified as marsupials, like kangaroos. Wrong. Look at the trial transcripts from the Dover school district trial and see every dishonest thing about this book brough out in the open under oath. [...] Read Dr Kevin Padian's testimony. It is sad that anyone would give this book to a child or young adult. it is worse that junk science, it is outright dishonest.
November 2005 · Books
the product in question
Of Pandas and People: The Central Question of Biological Origins
4.1★ · 157 ratings, as of 2023
worser bester