Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

Instead of profiting off Anne Frank's name, the author could have left this alone, as Otto Frank wanted, or donated all proceeds to Yad Vashem, or the Holocaust Museum. One of the two major groups that Otto Frank founded refused to cooperate, citing the author using Anne's name for profit. The accused informant, and the Frank family, didn't deserve this exploitaion. Today, the New York Times has an article entitled "Scholars Doubt New Theory on Anne Frank’s Betrayal", referring to this book. Among other rebuttals, they state that it was an extremely unlikely possibility that anyone would have a list of hiding places. Much of Sullivan's theory is based upon this supposition. Anne Frank's legacy, and that of other victims of war, deserve more than a well-funded, yet very speculative, documentary and book, which only enriches themselves, but unfairly denigrates others.