Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

according to people

214
people found this helpful, as of 2023
ranked #145,944 most helpful out of 571,544,897 reviews
★★☆☆☆
a disappointment
I started this book with high hopes. Martin Gilbert is a famous historian and has done much to educate the world about the holocaust. I also feel the idea of a strictly chronological blow-by-blow history of World War II is a promising premise. However, the book provides little more than a collection of facts arranged chronologically. There is absolutely no historical or political context--the invasion of Poland starts on page 1 and he never backtracks to fill it in. There is very little analysis, usually just a listing of what battles occurred each month and how many tanks, planes, and/or casualties on each side. Instead of forming an arresting narrative, it just becomes a mind-numbing list of events that are never tied together. The format could lend itself to a discussion of global strategy, being organized by time rather than region. However, this is never pursued. The only reason I would look at this book again is if I needed to reference it for facts or dates. A great deal of scholarship was clearly involved in assembling these and, as such, it might be a useful reference, but from such a book I would expect much more. Instead of reading this book, for a truly excellent history of WWII, read Weinberg's "A World at Arms".
August 2000 · Books
the product in question
The Second World War: A Complete History
4.3★ · 27 ratings, as of 2023
worser bester