Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

according to people

112
people found this helpful, as of 2023
ranked #241,123 most helpful out of 571,544,897 reviews
★☆☆☆☆
Depends on what you are using this for...
I am a semi pro nature photographer and I found this camera a sore disappointment as it pertains to image quality. I have been using Fuji for about 15 years and I switched to Nikon for a change. It contained most of the basic features as my Fuji except the eye lens. Please note: You are only able to take a picture using the display. If you need to see extreme detail, this may frustrate you. With a 40x zoom, you need an eye lens. I used the camera for about a week and a half. The image quality is terrible and every image on a regular/auto setting is thoroughly washed out. If you utilize the dawn/dusk or sunset setting it drops a blue cast over the image which in some cases looks ridiculous, but without it, it would be too bright. There is no definition or depth to the images. It seem to me I get either washed out/unremarkable images or blue images. Glare is hard to avoid as well even with a darker setting. You don't see this glare until you download the larger image. I have provided images side by side. From L to R is a cell phone image, one on Auto and one on Dawn/Dusk. At least the cell image has no glare. An everyday user for everyday life, this is fine. Other than that, it has no use. It is my opinion that the reviews posted are fictitious. There is simply no way I could be getting these pictures based on REAL reviews. It doesn't make sense.
March 2019 · Electronics · verified purchase
worser bester