Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

Schwab and Malleret want us to believe that all of us "in this together" can make a better world if only we subscribe to their great narrative. Schwab (the prime mover in this narrative) runs the WEF. He tells us that we're destroying the planet and climate change is the biggest threat. Of course, to answer this threat we'll have to have "necessary" measures-- after all, no one wants to kill the planet off, right? Who will decide what these necessary measures are? Have a look at the partners with the WEF on their website. Who do you see listed? Remember, we're supposed to be fighting the global warming boogieman. We see some of the biggest CO2 emitters listed (Chevron, Shell, etc.) We also see drug company Pfizer, which has paid billions in fines for illegal practices. These corporations are the ones partnering with the WEF to lead us into a better world. How do we suppose that'll work out-- the fox guarding the hen house? ( I don't subscribe to the pseudoscience of CO2 warming, but that's another story. Even so, to be told that global warming is the greatest threat and that the companies whose practices are supposedly making this happen are the same ones helping to lead us out, is a bit rich.) Now let's look at environmental organizations, which one would suppose would be the real partners with the WEF (which is supposedly going to address the biggest threat to humanity.) How about Greenpeace, The Nature Conservancy, the World Wildlife Fund, the Rainforest Action Network? Are they partners with the WEF? No, they are not. So what do you suppose will happen when we all come together in the wonderful collective that will work hard to make a Great Reset, when the partners with the WEF are essentially the world's most powerful corporations allied for the greater good in some sort of supranational, build-back-better alliance? Whose "greater good" do you suppose they'll be working for when, as is well-known by now, Schwab is all about big tech, big data, big organization, big monitoring, big managing? When the partners with his WEF Great Reset are the most powerful organizations in the world, including FB ("Meta",) which recently banned the Canadian truckers convoy page because we can't have people communicating to demand an end to Covid tyranny, can we? When we have "necessary"measures imposed to stop global warming, to whose benefit do we suppose those measures will incidentally accrue? And whose freedoms will "necessarily" have to be curtailed in order to ensure that we build-back-better? I know, I know: I'm spreading "misinformation." Surely there's a partner somewhere on the WEF list that can censor me? Amazon, for example?