Bests & Worsts Reviews from Amazon

Very, very few of his footnotes lead to valid information - and even when the reference is valid, Jarrett refers to it out of context. The vast majority of his footnotes lead to conservative opinion pieces which promote conspiracy theories. None of his footnotes lead to proof. He didn't provide footnotes for any of the indictments -- he totally ignored them. He repeats the same talking points, over and over. It got boring.